English Home Page    Japanese Home Page

Lilies of the Field Toil Not Neither Do They Spin

(Biblical Echo in Whitehead's Thoughts on Education)

Tamotsu YOSHIMA

OUTLINE

1   Introduction
Familiar Quotations from the Bible to help understand
Whitehead's philosophy.
2 Instances under Discussion
A. Solomon's dream.
Two aspects of Reason. Reason of Plato and Reason of
Ulysses incorporated.
Function of speculative philosophy.
B. The wind bloweth where it listeth.
Dialogue between Jesus and Nicodemus.
Mosaic Law as Order, Spiritual birth as Novelty.
C. The chaff is burnt.
Remorseless working of things and God's valuation towards
Order. Order and Novelty as instrument of God's subjective
aim.
D. A talent hidden away in a napkin.
Evil of storing in a napkin without gain.
True aim of education. Utilization of skill and knowledge.
E. The lilies of the field toil not.
Contrastive aspect of skill as unconscious habit and
creative imagination as mental activity in parallel with
that of Order and Novelty,
Paradoxical aspect of training in skill and freedom in
creative imagination. Example of Helen Keller.
3 Conclusion
Order and Novelty, the ideal opposites in Whitehead's
speculative philosophy, exemplified and coherent through-
out the above discussions with Whitehead's references to
the Bible in focus, regarding problems of education in
particular.

1 INTRODUCTION

In our study of English language and culture, knowledge of  familiar quotations from the Bible will prove helpful for  better appreciation of English  literature.  This  is  particularly true of  Whitehead's writings. His instances of reference to the Bible, however,  are  not literal quotations in most cases, but is what may be termed  'Biblical echo'. This is probably because they are so familiar that it  is  not necessary to indicate their exact texts or sources.

We find a record of Whitehead himself talking about his frequent quotations from the Bible in his lectures in Harvard University.

When I first lectured in American colleges, roughly, from
1924 to 1929--in those five years, I soon saw if I used a
quotation from the Bible that not one of my students had
ever read it, ever intended to, or had the least idea what
I was talking about, and if they sensed that I was speaking
of religion they leaned back until I should have got on to
something else; but in the years from 1929 to my retirement,
the last seven years of my active teaching, this attitude
changed, and when I spoke of religion there was an attentive
leaning forward.(Dialogues of Alfred North Whitehead, by
Lucien Price, p.102)

It seems natural, therefore, that in his  writings  also  he  should have made frequent references to familiar verses  in  the  Bible,  not only when he writes about religion but also his  philosophic  thoughts in general. An  approach  to  the  study  of  Whitehead's  philosophy through these familiar quotations from and  references  to  the  Bible seems to be a worthwhile attempt to understand Whitehead.

2 INSTANCES UNDER DISCUSSION

The following verses are some instances of  Whitehead's  quotations from the Bible.

A. Solomon's dream. (II Chronicles 1:7-12)
See The Function of Reason, pp. 39, 72, 74.
B. The wind bloweth where it listeth. (John 3:1-8)
See Science and the Modern World, p.12.
C. The chaff is burnt. (Matthew 3:12, Luke 3:17)
See Process and Reality, p.244.
D. A talent hidden away in a napkin.
(Matthew 25:14-30, Luke 19:12-27)
See Process and Reality, p. 177 and
The Aims of Education, p. 3.
E. The lilies of the field toil not. (Matthew 6:25-34
See Process and Reality, p. 339.

The common topic throughout those passages in which Whitehead  makes above references proves to be, for the  most  part,  the  antithetical ideas of Order and Novelty, in its relation to problems  of  education in particular.

The ideal scope of the word Order in these discussions would include such words as  Massive  Foundation,   Discipline,  System,  Repetition, Instinct, Inheritance, Unconscious Causal Efficacy. That of  Novelty, on the other hand, would include Freedom, Imaginative Zest, Curiosity, Fresh Change, Urge   Beyond,  Purpose,  Prayer,  Appetition,  Conscious Presentational Immediacy.

The common features of one group different from the other  might  as well be kept in mind throughout the discussions that follow.

A. Solomon's dream

Let me begin this topic with quoting the whole story  of  Solomon's dream from the Bible:

That night God appeared to Solomon and said, 'What shall I
give you? Tell me.' Solomon answered, 'Thou didst show
great and constant love to David my father and thou has
made me king in this place. Now, O Lord God, let thy word
to David my father be confirmed, for thou hast made me king
over a people as numerous as the dust on the earth. Give me
now wisdom and knowledge, that I may lead this people; for
who is fit to govern this great people of thine?'
God answered Solomon, 'Because this is what you desire,
because you have not asked for wealth or possessions or
honour or the lives of your enemies or even long life for
yourself, but have asked for wisdom and knowledge to govern
my people over whom I have made you king, wisdom and know-
ledge are given to you; I shall also give you wealth and
possessions and honour such as no king has had before you
and none shall have after you.
II Chronicles 1:7-12 (The New English Bible)

Whitehead refers to Solomon's Dream in the first and third  chapters of The Function of Reason:

The whole story of Solomon's dream suggests that the
antithesis between the two functions of Reason is not quite
so sharp as it seems at first sight. (FR 39)
About five hundred years before Christ, the Greeks initiated
its theoretical development for the love of the theory. This
was about four or five hundred after the date of Solomon's
dream, the greatest prophecy ever made. (FR 74.)

The main topic of The Function of Reason is concerned withthe two aspects of  function of reason,  Speculative Reason and Practical Reason. He calls the former, by way of symbolic figures, the Reason of Plato and the latter the Reason of Ulysses. The Reason of Plato seeks a complete understanding, whereas The Reason of Ulysses studies immediate method of action, which is, in modern sense, of practical methodology in science and technology.

Most scientists, confident of the brilliant success of  practical methodology, seem to have failed so far to give a due consideration to the broader perspective of the Speculative Reason  which  pursues  the complete understanding through the study of philosophy and religion.

The example of modern physics, however, shows   that  the  antithesis between the study of mathematical physics and   speculative  philosophy
"is not so sharp,"
Whitehead says,

In fact by reason of my own studies in mathematics and
mathematical physics, I did in fact arrive at my conviction
in this way. (SMW 138)

"My conviction in this way" of course means his  conviction   in  the speculative philosophy in which the Reason of Plato and the Reason of Ulysses are in close coordination,  because  the  two  are  in  mutual requirement and each should contribute to achievements of the other.

Narrowly  specialized  divisions  of  scientific  and  technological courses in present-day universities  are  in  case  in  point.  It  is commonplace to remark  that  what  is  required  in  these  scientific studies is a  broader  view  of  synthetic   coordination  between  the narrowly sub-divided  special  study  and  the  broader  philosophical understanding.

Such a  synthetic  coordination   is  also  required  in  the  modern curriculum of our primary and secondary schools, where teaching  small parts of a large number of subjects is the usual  practice.  Note  the following words of Whitehead.

The solution which I am urging, is to eradicate the fatal
disconnection of subjects which kills the vitality of our
modern curriculum. There is only one subject-matter for
education, and that is Life in  all  its  manifestations.(AE  10)

Thus, in true education, many subject-matters   are  unified  in  one subject-matter, which is life,  and  one  subject-matter   of  life  is manifested in many subject-matters. In  other  words,  many  subjects should be absorbed in the final unity of one subject,  life,  and  one subject is manifested in many subjects. Many in one, and one in many.

The reason Whitehead refers to Solomon's Dream would be that he sees in Solomon an ardent desire by way of prayer to God, derived from   the spirit of seeking Novelty, on the basis of his rich  inheritance  from his father King David's faithfulness to God together with his sense of responsibility of   governing  his  great  people  with  practical  and orderly methods. This can be considered  as  reflecting  the  idea  of coordination between the two functions of reason.

Whitehead suggests that we should seek to share   with  king  Solomon and the wise men of Greece, the wisdom of seeking both the  Reason  of Plato, a  complete  understanding  and  the  Reason  of  Ulysses,  the practical methodology in coordination with  it,  for  after  all  "the antithesis between the two functions of  Reason  is  not  quite  so sharp as it seems at first sight."

Here we may be reminded of the true aim of  speculative  philosophy, which Whitehead  defines  as  "the  endeavour   to  frame  a  coherent, logical, necessary system of general ideas in  terms  of  which  every element of our experience can be interpreted." The system of  general ideas is such that it can  never  fail  to  interpret   any  and  every element of our experience. The general ideas  throw  light  on  every experience of our life, and every occasion  of  our  many  experiences contribute to a system of general ideas.

B. The wind blows where it listeth

Whitehead quotes this Biblical verse where he refers to the  obvious fact of the Recurrences of things which establish the universal Order, calling attention to the   complementary  fact  just  as  obvious,  the Change in Nature.
Let me quote the passage first:

Obviously, the main recurrences of life are too insistent
to escape the notice of the least rational of humans; and
even before the dawn of rationality, they have impressed
them selves upon the instincts of animals. It is unneces-
sary to labour the point, that in broad outline certain
general states of nature recur, and that our very natures
have adapted themselves to such repetitions. But there
is an complementary fact which is equally true and equally
obvious:--nothing ever really recurs in exact detail. No
two days are identical, no two winters. What has gone, has
gone forever. Accordingly the practical philosophy of man-
kind has been to expect the broad recurrences, and to accept
the details as emanating from the inscrutable womb of things
beyond the ken of rationality. Men expected the sun to rise,
but the wind bloweth where it listeth.
(SMW 12. Underline mine)

The fact of actual recurrences in nature is obvious and formative of the rational ideas. The fact of changes in detail in each  recurrence is equally obvious, and is a condition for  creative  advance  of  the world. We are obliged to accept this antithetical fact "as  emanating from the inscrutable womb of things beyond the ken of rationality."

The above quotation from the Bible is typical of the  way  Whitehead refers to a familiar verse in the Bible. Most readers may be left with a vague sense of adumbrating something important. The line of thought in this passage, however, seems to suggest the dual  aspect  of  Order and Novelty.

The original verse "The wind blows  where  it  listeth"  is  in  the dialogue of Jesus with Nicodemus, a Pharisee, the   strict  observer  of Moses' Law.

Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot
enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the
flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is
spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born
again. The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest
the sound thereof, but cannot tell whence it cometh, and
whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the spirit. (v.8)

Jesus, while realizing the importance of order in   the  Mosaic  Law, also talked about the spiritual birth, issuing from   the  free  mental function of novel spirit. Every word of Jesus in this   dialogue  with Nicodemus carries an important meaning. Not only does it  involve,  I believe,  the  vital  Christian   doctrine,  but  also  it  reveals  an important metaphysical truth. For this is   also  an  example  of  the ideal opposites of Order and Novelty. The mere sense of order tends to degenerate into a blind and loveless observance of  the  law,  whereas Novelty  is  the  craving  for  a  change  toward  the  living  mental functioning such as  imagination,  wider  perspective,  introspection, conscience, repentance of sins.

Whitehead says,

Order is not sufficient. What is required, is something much
more complex. It is order entering upon novelty. (PR 339)

Order and Novelty are in mutual requirement. Conceptual realization of 'order' is causative of the craving for the novel change into a new life born of spirit. The new life realized in love, in turn,  fulfills the requirement of order for its renewal in the  creative  advance  of the world, for "he who loves his fellow man has fulfilled the law."(Romans 13:8)

In passing, there is reason to assume that Jesus himself quoted this verse from part of the Old Testament, for it is recorded that as a boy he frequented the synagogue where he was able to have access  to  scrolls of the Scriptures, so that he must have been well   conversant  with  some important parts of the Scriptures. For example,  the  cross-reference of the verse "The wind blows where it listeth." indicates a  verse  in the the Old Testament, which reads,

As thou knowest not what is the way of the spirit, nor
how the bones do grow in the womb of her that is with child:
even so thou knowest not the works of God who maketh all.
(Ecclesiastes 11:5)

In the original languages of the Bible, either Hebrew or Greek,  the same word is said to have been used to mean both "wind" and  "spirit", and it can be translated into English in either way. Thus the verse is translated in the Authorized Version as "As thou knowest not  what  is the way of the spirit", whereas in the Revised Version,  the  footnote for the same verse reads "As you do not know the  way  of  the wind." It seems too far-fetched to construe  Whitehead's  quotation   of  this verse in this way, but it seems proper to read this  passage  in  this context.

C. The chaff is burnt

This verse Chaff Is Burnt is not a  literal  quotation  from  the Bible, but it obviously comes from Matthew 3:12 and Luke 3:17, as  the words of John the Baptist.

John answered, saying unto them all, I indeed baptize
you with water; but one mightier than I cometh, the
latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: he
shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire:
Whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge
his floor, and will gather the wheat into his garner;
but the chaff he will burn with fire unquenchable.
(Luke 3: 16 and 17)

John the Baptist preached in the wilderness for   the  repentance  of sins to prepare for the new life born of spirit.  Those  who  fail  to comply with the divine aim and who do  not  produce  fruit  worthy  of repentance will be doomed to be burnt as the useless chaff on the   day of final judgment. This is one aspect of God as of remorseless  order personified as the Goddess of mischief.

Whitehead's reference to this verse is found in the chapter  of  The Transmission of Feelings, where he reviews some of the  key  ideas  of the philosophy of organism, such as actual  entities,  self-causation, subjective aim, God. The focal point of this introductory section  is summarized in the last two sentences of the following  passage,  in which Whitehead draws attention to his idea of 'order'.

This function of God is analogous to the remorseless working
of things in Greek and in Buddhist thought. The initial
aim is the best for that impasse. But if the best is bad,
then the ruthlessness of God can be personified as Ate,
the goddess of mischief. The chaff is burnt. What is
inexorable in God is valuation as an aim towards 'order'.
(PR 244, underline mine)

Here, in this section, Whitehead refers to one aspect  of  order  as remorseless and ruthless working of God.

The idea of 'order' is always crucial to Whitehead's philosophy, for the whole universe is in  the  grip  of  the  hierarchies  of  orders, natural and social, interconnected in high  complexity,   characterized as remorseless working of things.

Apart from this remorseless working of things in 'order',  there  is another aspect concomitant with it, namely 'subjective aim', which is an endowment from God in the initial stage of the concrescent  subject (such as the human  being,  for  example)  which  "inherits   from  the inevitable ordering of things conceptually realized in the  nature  of God." (PR 243)

Thus, the initial stage of the aim in  the  concrescent  subject  is rooted in the nature of God, but its completion depends on  the  self-determination of  the  subject  itself,  for  "the   immediacy  of  the concrescent subject is constituted by its living aim at its own  self-constitution." (ibid.) In this sense, a concrescent actual entity (a human being, for example) is self-creating creature  and  part-creator with the transcendent creator, God. When  an  actual  entity  excludes God's subjective aim without autonomous  living  aim  toward  creative advance, "then the ruthlessness of  God  can  be  personified  as  the goddess of mischief."

Whitehead, therefore, questions whether this   remorseless  of  order personified as the goddess of mischief  represents  the  whole  truth. There must be something more to promote  creative  advance,  a  tender caretaker as God the redeemer. Let  me  quote  Whitehead's   own  words which suggest the inevitable relationship between  system  and  freshness, or 'Order' as foundation and 'Novelty' as renewed change as  the condition for creative advance.

It belongs to the goodness of the world, that its settled
order should deal tenderly with the faint discordant light
of the dawn of another age. Also order, as it sinks into
the background before new conditions, has its requirements.
The old dominance should be transformed into the firm founda-
tions, upon which new feelings arise, drawing their intensities
from delicacies of contrast between system and freshness.
(PR 339)

Mere order is not sufficient, even though  it  is  required  as  the essential foundation. What is required is immediate  valuation   rooted in the nature of God, which is  a  mental  function  of  novelty,  the 'subjective aim, functioning on the basis of inherited order, for Order and Novelty are  the  instrument   of  God's  subjective  aim  for  the creative advance of the world. Thus, "What is inexorable  in  God  is valuation as an aim toward order."

D. A talent hidden away in a napkin

The parable of the talent may briefly be outlined as follows:

'You wicked and  slothful  servant!'  answered  the  master  to  the servant who stored in a napkin the entrusted talent  without   trading with it for profit. The other two servants, in contrast, trading  with the talents the master had entrusted to them, brought additional  five and two talents each, to his master's great joy and approval.
(See Matthew Chapt. 25, and Luke Chapt. 19).

Whitehead refers to this verse in the following passage.

As we pass to the inorganic world, causation never for a
moment seems to lose its grip. What is lost is originative-
ness, and any evidence of immediate absorption in the present.
So far as we can see, inorganic entities are vehicles of receiv-
ing, for storing in a napkin, and for restoring without loss or
gain. (PR 177)

In short, "Storing in a napkin" means to keep something idle without putting it into the proper use which requires a higher level of  human mentality more than mere animal life.

In process philosophy, basic activities of actual entities or actual occasions, both inorganic and organic, are the  process  of  receiving what is given from the actual world and transmitting it for the future This doctrine attributes 'feeling' through which  both  receiving  and transmission is accomplished.  It  involves  all  actual  entities  or occasions, ranging from inorganic entities such as atoms or molecules, to the higher organic living occasions along the personal route of the life of the human being.

There are grades of actual occasions ranging from   the  low  to  the high. The lowest  grade  is  those  actual  occasions  of  non-living objects, such as electrons or other primitive organism. The  world  is in the firm grip of these fundamental organisms.

A higher grade would be plants  and  animals,  which  are  the  life history of enduring living occasions. The highest grade is the life of the human being which is the life-history  of  enduring  objects  with conscious urge for the novel mentality represented by thought,  imagination, wish, prayer, through symbolic reference   of  language  activities. This is the originativeness of human mentality.

Inorganic objects and the lower organic entities such as animal life are characterized  by  mechanical   repetitions  in  which  novelty  is negligible; they are just "storing in a napkin and  restoring  without loss or gain" whatever they inherit from the past.

What differentiates the human being from the lower organic  entities is, needless to say, the high level of mentality which  animals  lack. It is the urge beyond, to make difference for creative advance.

Whitehead also refers to this parable of the   talent  in  the  first chapter of The Aims of Education, where he discusses the true aims  of education.

Pedants sneer at an education which is useful. But if education
is not useful, what is it? Is it a talent, to be hidden away
in a napkin? (AE 3)
Education is the acquisition of the art of utilization of
knowledge. This is an art very difficult to impart.(AE 6)

What is the useful education? Education begins with acquiring basic skills and knowledge with the ensuing utilization and  application  of them. Mere imparting of knowledge and mere training  in  skills  seems comparatively easy. It is  always  possible  to  cram  the  minds  of students a certain amount of knowledge  and  to  train  them  in  some skills. But the knowledge without the proper utilization only  remains what Whitehead calls "inert knowledge". Mere skill without any  proof of its useful value is always abomination to the student.  Unutilized knowledge and skill are just "stored it in a napkin."

One problem of education is that we  often  fail  in  attempting   to contrive a way of utilizing the 'acquired'  skill  and  knowledge.  To coordinate these  two  requirements   are  most  difficult  problem  in education.

Of course, useful education is not  to  be  confined  to  a  narrow, short-sighted aim for some immediate use, at which pedants sneer.   The truly useful education should aim at the art of realizing the value of basic skills and knowledge. This realization is the joy  of  discovery of the usefulness of acquired knowledge and skills.

The essential need of basic skills and knowledge in education may be symbolized by the story of Helen Keller and her teacher Miss Sullivan. It is the constant and untiring  practice  of  manipulatory  skill  of spelling on the hand of Helen Keller by Miss Sullivan that  led  Helen Keller to her dramatic joy of discovery of the mystery of language, to say nothing of her remarkable advance in further skills   and  intelligent activities that followed.

. The lilies of the field toil not, neither do they spin

Whitehead refers to the 'lilies of the field' in Section III of  the chapter of Final Interpretation  of  Process  and  Reality,  in  which Whitehead reviews the ideal opposites of Order and  Novelty  As  has often been repeated, the idea of 'Order' assumes  the  primary  importance in the philosophy of organism. One aspect of order is the matter of repetitions  issuing  in  the  causal  efficacy  which  is  largely unconscious, like the air we breath.

Opposite to the idea of Order is that of Novelty,   characterized  by the life present, immediate and conscious. As to the essential  nature of this opposite pole, Whitehead says,

Some new principles of refreshment is required. The art of
progress is to preserve order amid change, and to preserve
change amid order.

Further he says,

The lesson of the transmutation of causal efficacy into
presentational immediacy is that great ends are reached by
life in the present; life novel and immediate, but deriving
its richness by its full inheritance from the rightly organized
animal body. It is by reason of the body, with its miracle of
order, that the treasures of the past environment are poured
into the living occasion. The final percipient route of occasions
is perhaps some thread of happenings wandering in 'empty' space
amid the interstices of the brain. It toils not, neither does it
spin. It receives from the past; it lives in the present. (PR 339)

Order is the  necessary  foundation  on  which  the  present  living occasions are to be realized. The human body, a miracle  of  order  is the solid, but unconscious, foundation upon which it is  possible  for the human soul to express its mental activities. Here we may note the obvious fact that the characteristic of the foundation is to be  solid but usually under cover and a matter of unconsciousness  in  spite  of its obvious importance.

Education is an important example of social order in human  society. It is only natural for Whitehead to begin the section with the problem of education where he reviews the ideal opposite of Order and Novelty. Let me first quote the part in which Whitehead puts emphasis on  skill or technique at the one end of the pole, order.

The condition for excellence, is a thorough training in technique.
Sheer skill must pass out of the sphere of conscious exercise,
and must have assumed the character of unconscious habit. The
first, second, and the third condition for high achievement is
scholarship, in that enlarged sense including knowledge and
acquired instinct controlling action. (PR 338)

He has probably in mind the teaching and learning of subject-matters in schools such as mathematics or  language.  He  emphasizes   on  the routines of giving thorough training in skill, for skill is  obviously a matter of order or  discipline   in  education,  and  that  skill  or technique should be learned so thoroughly as to pass out of the sphere of conscious exercise and assume the character of unconscious habit.

Order and discipline in the training of skill and in imparting basic knowledge in the process of teaching and  learning  of  a  subject  is different from the unconscious order in nature, because such an  order or a skill of a subject-matter is usually acquired  through  conscious efforts until it becomes unconscious habit  or  what  Whitehead  calls 'acquired instinct.'

Whitehead seems to symbolize  this  unconscious  habit  or  acquired instinct, by quoting the verse "the lilies  of  the  field  toil  not, neither do they spin." This means that in the training  of  skill  in education this stage of unconscious habit, or acquired  instinct  must be aimed at, for it is on this unconscious exercise of  order  as  the foundation that the true aim of education in terms of useful  application in novel thought or creative imagination is to be fulfilled.

Educationists talk too much about creative imagination to ignore the necessary role of training in skill. The reason for the neglect is   of course the tendency of the drab skill falling  into  dry,  mechanical, repetitive exercises.

This function of order in education as 'acquired   instinct'  may  be compared to that of our healthy body. We are rarely conscious of  any part of our body, unless that part is  ill.  Thus  the  importance  of skill as 'acquired instinct' in education may be likened  to  that  of the healthy body.

It is clear that, while Whitehead emphasizes on thorough training in technique, he no less  emphasizes  on  the  other  end  of  the  pole, represented  by  creative  imagination   or  what  he  calls  impulsive imaginative zest.

Paradoxically, the inevitable repetition required for  the  acquisition of skill is the very reason for   stifling  creative  imagination, and due care must be  taken  against  any  over-exercise   that  limits mental activities. Thus Whitehead says.

Another contrast is equally essential for the understanding of
ideals--the contrast between order as the condition for excel-
lence, and order as stifling the freshness of living. This contrast
is met with in the theory of education. (PR 338)

Further he says,

The paradox which wrecks so many promising theories of education
is that the training which produces skill is so very apt to
stifle imaginative zest. Skill demands repetition, and imagina-
tive zest is tinged with impulse. Up to a certain point each
gain in skill opens new paths for the imagination. But in each
individual, formal training has its limit of usefulness. Beyond
that limit there is degeneration: 'The lilies of the field toil
not, neither do they spin.' (ibid.)

This is the paradox which confronts any conscientious teacher,  for the acquisition of skill is the condition for excellence,  and  at  the same time is  the  reason  for  the  danger  of  killing  such  mental functions as curiosity, interest, or the joy of discovery. The importance of skill in learning is best illustrated by the dramatic event in which Helen Keller as a deaf and dumb child of seven experienced,  for the first time in her life, the great   joy  of  discovering  the  true meaning of language.

The very first thing Miss Sullivan taught her was to spell the  word "d-o-l-l" and some other  simple  words  for  familiar  objects.  This practice of manipulative skill  continued   for  several  weeks  until Helen, getting so impatient  and  angry  at  this  repeated  attempts, dashed the doll upon the floor. Even after this  sad  incidence,  Miss Sullivan, with infinite love and patience, took her to the well-house, where the same exercise of spelling on her hand of the word w-a-t-e-r, was repeated, pouring on her hand a gush of water from the pump. Then, all of a sudden, there came to her  the  dramatic  revelation  of  the mystery of language.

I left the well-house eager to learn. Everything had a name,
and each name gave birth to a new thought.-- It would have
been difficult to find a happier child than I was as I lay
at the close of that eventful day and lived over the joys
it had brought me, and for the first time longed for a new
day to come." (The Story of My Life, chapter IV)

This basic, limited skill of spelling on her hand opened  up  a  new path to the wider world  of  thought  and  imagination.  She  went  on pursuing the world of further thought and imagination, but this simple and crude technique of spelling  on  her  hand  must  have  had  grave limitations. She must go on learning  more  advanced  skills  such  as Braille. Later she developed lip reading and even the ordinary  speech sound of her own that made it  possible  to  make  herself  understood through speech. All these skills contributed to  her  great  world  of imagination, thought and communication to the  enormous  benefits  for herself and for the whole humanity.

This dual aspect of skill and creative imagination, which are  antithetical to each other but require and stimulate each other, should be the matter of central concern  in  education.  This  ideal  opposites, technique and imaginative zest, to use Whitehead's own words,  corresponds to that of Order and Novelty, which is one of the key  ideas  in the philosophy of organism.

3 CONCLUSION

In considering some of the Biblical  references  of  Whitehead  with the key ideas of his philosophy in mind, it comes out that there is, in each instance, the example of ideal opposites of  Order  and  Novelty, either overtly or covertly.

Order is fundamental in God's creative activity.   For  example,  the human body as well as the lilies of the field is the   miracle  of  the order of nature, and it is on this basis of order that either a  human being or the lilies of the field can enjoy the immediate valuation  of life.

Apart from the order of nature, there is also   a  great  variety  of order in human society. For instance, language is a system  of  order, so is the codes of law. On these foundations the   essential  need  of communication and orderly life is to be realized.

The ideal state of order  is  characterized  by  unconscious   causal efficacy. Just as we usually use our language without being conscious of its grammatical order, so we are not particularly conscious of  the workings of our bodily order. Too much  consciousness  of  grammar  or bodily function is a symptom of ineffectiveness or bodily disorder. It is on the basis of our healthy, unconscious functionings of order that we usually enjoy the immediate present occasions.

Novelty, on the other hand, is free,  unbounded  mentality  such  as 'imaginative zest' or 'anarchic  impulse'  to  refresh  living  actual occasions with novel change towards creative advance of the world.  It is an appetitive urge for the future change.

'Order' is causative of activities of novelty, which  is,  in  turn, formative  of  renewed  order  for  creative  advance  of  the  world. Solomon's dream is a story  of  his  prayer  to  God  for  wisdom  and knowledge of a complete understanding   and  of  practical  methods  in affairs of governing his people. This story  suggests  the  important role of speculative philosophy that aims at a  complete  understanding of general ideas which are interpretative of all  the  facets  of  our experiences, thus leading to the wisdom and knowledge for  our  better life.

Apart from the theoretical understanding of speculative  philosophy, the practical knowledge of a special field of science has  some  value and contributes to the wisdom of its own kind. It is true that theoretical understanding and practical knowledge have tended to be  antithetical, but the two should be brought together for the betterment of our life. The whole chapter in which Solomon's dream is   three  times cited, can be regarded as focusing on Whitehead's idea of  speculative philosophy, especially  on  the  the  two  functions   of  reason,  the coordination between the Reason of Plato and the Reason of Ulysses, or the ideal opposite of Order and Novelty.

Jesus spoke to Nicodemus, leader of the Pharisees who boasted  themselves on their strict observance of the Mosaic law  for  the  maintenance of community order. Mere order, even if it is a basic factor in life, tends to degenerate  into  mechanical  lifeless  repetitions. Mere observance of law, which has a smack of hypocrisy,  is  not  only insufficient but even evil. What is required is the mental function of novelty, which is in this case the new life born  of  the  spirit,  an urge toward a better life ever renewed.

What does "The chaff is burnt" mean? This  is  a  warning  directed toward those who will not produce fruit in keeping with  the  requirement of Novelty, doomed to be burnt as useless chaff  on  the  day  of judgment. They are only left with the remorseless  workings  of  inevitable order as personified in the goddess of mischief.

John the Baptist, citing this verse, preached the repentance of sins as a precursor to the redeemer to come after him, the  good  shepherd, fellow-sufferer for the spiritual creative advance of the world.  Thus John gave a warning to those who not only disobey the law of order but disregard the autonomous self-determination to comply with the subjective aim derived from God. They will finally   be  separated  just like from  the grain as the useless chaff to be burnt.

Whitehead, on the other hand, says,

It belongs to the goodness of the world, that its settled order
should deal tenderly with the faint discordant light of the dawn
of another age."(PR 339)

The inexorable order is not without the element of tenderness, which is indicative of the dual aspect of the divine fatherhood with justice and righteousness and with the element of tenderness as well.

Turning to the topic of education, a subject-matter or a  course  of study in formal education is largely a matter of order, consisting  of the basic matters to be learned as  fundamental  discipline.   It  is true that acquiring the basic matters of a subject as a discipline  is essential in the process of education, but again it is not  sufficient in themselves. What is required is the utilization and  valuation   of basic knowledge and skill thus acquired. It is  an  outcome  of  mental workings such as curiosity or creative imagination. It is a proof and a joyful discovery of the usefulness of knowledge and skill. It is   what prompts students to pursue advanced study of  the  subject.  It  is  a novel change for the future, an urge beyond. In this sense, what  is most important in education is also to realize this inevitable  aspect of Order and Novelty.

The most difficult part of education is to find a due proportion  of the antithetical poles of the training of skill and the free  exercise of creative imagination. The difficulty lies in   the  fact  that  "the training which produces skill is so very  apt  to  stifle  imaginative zest. "Skill demands repetition, and imaginative zest is tinged  with impulse." (PR 338)

Moreover, the training in skill should be so   thorough  that  "sheer skill must pass out of the sphere of conscious exercise, and must have assumed the character of unconscious habit. "Whitehead calls the state of unconscious habit 'acquired instinct.' (op.cit.)

An example of acquired instinct may be seen in the   child  of  about five years of age, who has acquired the  basic  order  of  the  mother tongue. The unconscious grammar functions  as  causal  efficacy.  The child, then, can concentrate enjoying conscious  application  for  the novelty of living communication. The child has acquired the  language skill as effective causal efficacy, as 'acquired instinct', and it  is on this basis that the child can concentrate on  active  communication as presentational immediacy.

In this sense, the child at this stage of development,  like  lilies of the field, "does not toil, neither does it spin. It  receives  from the past; it lives in the present." (PR 339)

(Jan. 1998)

References:

Price, Lucian, Dialogue of Alfred North Whitehead.
London: Max Reinhardt, 1954
The Bible, The King James Version.
Revised Standard Version.
The New English Bible.
Keller, Helen, The Story of my  Life. New York: Dell Pub. Co.,1966.
Whitehead, A. N., Process and Reality(PR).
Science and the Modern World(SMW).
The Function of Reason(FR).
The Aims of Education(AE).